We live in a digital era where friendships are forged and
forgotten at the twiddle of our thumbs. The same newspaper that publishes
scientific studies showing how smart phones and technology is altering social
side of humans (read as ruining relationships) continues to expand their
digital footprint and social media presence. While one set of parents want to
prolong the digital innocence of their children and delay their social web
graduation, the other set gets an email account and face book account for their
unborn babies with a hurry to establish their digital identities. What is
happening here? I am missing the obvious and ominous signs?
Define the
qualification criteria
A few years ago I analyzed the digital requests that I receive
from colleagues, new acquaintances and strangers. Colleagues with whom I work
every day and new acquaintances sent me Facebook requests, while strangers with
whom I’ve never seen or professional engaged with continue send me LinkedIn
requests. Why do these people want connect with me on the digital space? Does
engaging on the digital space means blurring lines between colleagues,
acquaintances and strangers?
Begin with a purpose
In age where social media following decides your celebrity
status, establishing the purpose and communicating it is important to sustain
the connection. I rarely send out requests until I am absolutely sure that we
needed to stay engaged through digital channel. When some of my friends from
the same city send me a FB request, I ruthlessly denied their acceptance. I
prefer saving them for a real face-to-face interaction and delay their
admission until we moved to different cities. I apply the same principles to
requests that I received on LinkedIn. I let my colleague’s requests age and add
them when I moved on to another organization and when there is real need and
purpose.
Let them earn their
stripes
Though I operated on Facebook under an alias, I followed a
set of self-made rules to add or delete. During the four years operating under
an alias, I never used privacy control nor did I use the delete button often
because I made a conscious choice of whom I let in into my digital world. I
even told the aspirants that there is a 3 year waiting period to get on my
Facebook, just to discourage them from queuing up and weed out the fake ones
(inspired by Michael Porters Marketing Model Framework). I prefer letting
people earn their stripes just as my grandmother selectively relaxes the entry
rules to her kitchen.
More control, less troll
It is important that we control our interactions and
engagements to make them mutually meaningful in the social media maze. I used
social media to inform my dear ones (only 35) on my whereabouts and the amazing
discoveries I made during my trips, I shared images of what I baked on a Sunday
afternoons, interesting reads I came across, personal points-of-views, and
sometimes tagged them to videos and articles based on their interests. I was
never upset if they didn’t take notice of my posts or liked them.
Ignore bloated egos
and inflated endorsements
Who invented the Like button? The Like button is like soda; it comes with a
lot of sugar and fizz and gives you a momentary rush that eventually turns into
an addict. When I talk about the Like button I must also talk about endorse and
recommend features on LinkedIn. Sometimes reading through mutual endorsements,
makes me feel suspicious if I am reading facts or fiction. Every sentence is
punctuated with a superlative and makes individuals look a Superman or
Superwoman. Where are the real people? Or do you misrepresent us to the world?
Have we become fabulous liars on the digital world? I still have a few
unprocessed recommendations waiting because I don’t know them more to endorse
their work.
The last straw
During the recent Charlie Hebdo massacre in Paris, I had
shared an opinion column from the Guardian on my FB page on how “Je suis
Charlie” campaign doesn’t make sense. Within minutes one of my friends on FB
sent me a text message saying that I was being anti-French and that he is
ashamed to have known me and stay connected with me on Facebook. Honestly, I
liked the arguments put forward by the author and her healthy approach of
approaching a subject from multiple viewpoints rather than being steadfast and
standing our ground and going for the easy delete option. A harmless post
uprooted a friendship that took years to sprout.
Digital makes no
difference
I learnt my biggest lessons of life from observing and
engaging with people on digital world. Despite having these stringent rules and
principles, I’ve infuriated friends and managed to lose some good friendships.
I’ve also compared the quality of relationships that I hold with people who I
don’t engage digitally vs with those whom I engage digitally. I find that the
digital world grows our unconscious bias and colors our perception based on
images we see and information we read and share. Jealousy, superego, and
narcissism creep in like an uninvited guest (weeds) and forces one to re-think
their presence and friends on digital world.
Back to old ways
Values and morals seemed to be missing in the digital world.
What has recently worried me is our digital appetite: the way we consume data
and people, the trend has been more worrying than what we eat and calories
associated with it. I had to end my addiction!
After much contemplation backed by experiences and data
points from my social experimentations, I hit the delete button on multiple
channels last week. I didn’t want to vanish discourteously from their world
without a notice or a thank-you. I sent out emails to all those whom I was
connected with informing them about my decision to end my digital presence and
signed off digitally. Yes, I am back to my good old ways of engaging with real
people and face-to-face.
No comments:
Post a Comment