The same question has been asked by various people across different
age groups, genders, nationalities and in a variety of different tones ranging
from that of concern and curiosity to validate their judgments and hunches. The
last time I was asked this question outside the country was at the point of
entry into the US by an immigration officer and again recently by my classmates
who I had met after a gap of 20 years.
I always change my response based on their tone. I either
duck the question or provide a canned, humorous or tangential response. To the immigration officer in the US, I asked
him if he was interested in me and to my classmate I told him that I couldn't
find a single woman who was interested in me. Not sure if he found my answer
humorous or ridiculous, but it put an end to the topic of marriage.
Most of them gave me a sympathetic look and left me under a
pile of unsolicited advice, while some tried their conversion tactics including
painting a gray scene of my lonely old age. Tired of such threats, advises, scrutiny
and judgments, I began questioning their decision to get married, have kids and
even went to the extent of asking them if they possessed the skills to play the role of a
partner and a parent. Most answers were honest and they wanted to abide
by the script laid out by the society.
Resist and Initiate Change
I recently shared my
bitter experiences and the stupid logic offered by married folks to a colleague
who is an expert in design thinking. He shared with me a paper titled “Changing the Status Quo written by H. William Dettmer” and used the evaporating
cloud model proposed by Efrat to explain the psychology of happiness,
security, satisfaction, adoption and more importantly why we resist/initiate
change to explain why some stay single and many go with marriage.
He began to enlighten me by stating objective of life in a
single sentence: to multiply or maintain our state of happiness. As explained by the evaporating cloud concept
by Goldratt in his paper, Dettmer says that happiness can be attained either
through the satisfaction route or the security route. And this probably
explains why some of us resist change and some of us initiate change. When I
mapped the reasons given by most of my married friends, I could easily fit them
into one of these categories and probably could explain why some continue to
enjoy it or why some wiggled out of it without posing them with embarrassing
questions.
The ominous bell
curve
The ominous bell curve is used from birth to death to
explain every aspect of our personal and professional life. I extrapolated
Dettmer bell-curve to explain the adoption by various categories of people in
society and how various marketing programs are put together to address those in
the middle (early majority and late majority) of the curve. Though he didn’t
point out my spot on the extreme, but I knew my place.
A symbiotic 3-way relationship
As a marketing professional, I paused for a couple of minutes
to mentally list down various marketing programs that I’ve launched to pitch and promote a product,
service or a platform and also conversion program to attract those in the late
majority and laggard categories. Amongst so many other things in life the
institution of religion and marriage seem to have so much in common and
propagate each other for their survival and hold a symbiotic relationship. Both
of them seed an illusion in the minds of people and try to convert those in
late majority and influence laggards. Yes, misery loves company.
Mythology also offers you some good examples of conversions,
for example Viswamitra who was focused on penance was converted by Menaka and
she ended up marrying him and disturbed him from achieving his objective. There
have been numerous occasions where I was courted by women colleagues and
coerced by my male friends to get married; unlike Viswamitra, I remain
steadfast, say like Bheeshma.
And today most governments support marriage and reproduction
either directly or indirectly. Most state governments in India offer free gold
mangalsutra to women and some political parties even sponsor mass marriages.
Despite family courts overflowing with divorce cases and custody battles,
marriages and irresponsible reproduction are on the increase.
While Governments turn into parasite living off single
people, religious institutions seek funds and patronage to hold their
festivities to retain, reinforce, attract and convert people to their faith. Sometimes
out of desperation, Governments, Religious institutions and those in wedlock
loot exploit and loot each other to protect their interest, relevance and
existence.
Conservative to
Risk-averse: A gradual progression
William Dettmer in his research papers conveys that both
early and late majority categories often borrow experiences from early adopters
and laggards. And that also explains why some get converted and some remain
committed to single-hood. Unfortunately, the world perceive single hood as an
anomaly and often judge single people ruthlessly.
As I was getting ready to label myself as a complete
risk-averse individual it struck me that I don’t always belong to this
category. I got my first iPhone 7 years ago and then got a drone to engage in ariel
photography two years ago when debates were still on to permit flying of drones. May be my economic status and no barriers to
exit explains my early adoption behavior with regards to technology?
When I look back at my life, I realize that I didn't start
in the extreme right, but slowly moved from late majority to laggard category.
The move happened as a result of learning that I borrowed from others and
watching the world that goes by the popular script. I've also heard and seen
early adopters and conservative risk-takers confess their mistake of saying “I
do”. Sadly, the cost of exit is high when it comes to marriage and kids.
While married folks have reasons to celebrate their life,
lifestyle and milestones, laggards (read as single) like me have none, but that
doesn't mean we should become the cynosure of all eyes by attending such
events. Over the years, I've made a conscious decision to boycott such events and
stay away from all those who preach, profess and propagate marriage.
Religion, Government and Marriage hasn't done much good to the society and despite the grim situation many us of are married or aspire to get married with a hope of conquering happiness. You can do more good to society by staying away from these evils.
Be wise, stay single and happy!
So much drama in your life Arun :)
ReplyDeleteBTW Bheeshma was married.. He only took a vow of celibacy... hmm..as if it really matters...
I'm often inclined to believe that the society complicates simple things. Honestly, those who choose to stay single and follow paths that they are passionate about are least bothered about what others think of them. They just don't have the time - and I'm sure you'll agree.
ReplyDelete