Thursday, February 17, 2011

Contestants humiliated on Carnatic Music Idol TV Show


Carnatic Music Idol, a music competition that gets telecasted on Jaya TV unearths youth talent in the Carnatic Music across the world. There are some contestants who’ve come from overseas to take part in the competition and the winner walks away with two concert slots – one at Jaya TV Markazhi Maha utsavam and other at Cleaveland Thyagaraja Aradhanai.

The first season of CM Idol was held last year, and it unearthed potential singers like Barath Sundar, Sriranjani Santhanagopalan, Brinda Manikavasagam, etc. Now the second season is on and Balaji the comparer of the show proudly announces the new tagline of the show in every episode, “Carnatic Music Idol - It is not a competition but it a career”. Let us assume what Balaji says is true, then Carnatic Musicians seated on the judges panel are all would-be colleagues for selected the participants, Am I right?

The initial round of selection was done by Sashikiran and Gayathri Venkatragavan and the next level of screening was done by Sowmya and Ganesh. A contestant turned up in a trouser and shirt for the selection since he came from Sholinagur (more than 100 kms away from Chennai and had travelled by train). When he came on the dais Ganesh and Sowmya derided him without giving an opportunity to explain or magnanimity to understand. Such is the quality of the judges on the panel.

Now the semi-final is on and the panel of judge consists of Sowmya, Sashikiran, Gayatri Venkatragavan, Ganesh, Kumaresh and Neyveli Santhanagopalan. But sadly none of them on the panel except Neyveli Santhanagopalan exhibit maturity, respect and even worth a seat on that panel.
Why did Sowmya, Sashikiran, Gayathri Venkatraghavan find a place on the panel? Is it because they have a personal equation with the show producer? Is it because they charge less to make appearances on such shows? Is it beacuse they have a glamor quotient? What have these guys achieved in their professional to sit on the panel? Do they have all the qualities what it takes to be a judge? I have seen more than half of the seats empty in Sowmya and Sashikiran’s concert. Are they crowd puller or crowd chasers? Well after this behavior they can only be crowd chasers and fall in the category of tear gas, pepper spray, water gun, etc.

Imagine you are going for a job interview and your senior colleagues on the interview panel make fun of your education, attire, skill set, bully you throughout the interview while trying to show off their seniority and experience and humiliate you in front of thousands of viewers? Is this a very professional way of interviewing and understanding your potential? Then why does comperer Balaji refer to this show as a career and not competition? Would you ever want to join such a profession and have these people for colleagues? May be that is why Carnatic Music is still restricted to a few cities, a few communities and cliques.

All on the panel except Neyveli Santhanagopalan are unprofessional in their approach, attitude and behavior. It is easy for him to get carried away, but Santhanagopalan comes across a true teacher, magnanimous senior and one who stokes passion, learning and explore new dimensions of Carnatic music. He methodically explores the depth of their patanthra, asks questions to make them think (not humiliate) in different dimension and slowly hold them to walk out of the puzzle. There is so much of learning and encouragement for not just the participants but thousands of viewers and rasikas of Carnatic music. This approach to learning turns a spark in the contestant into a fire, and what follows is perseverance and passion.

Here is another instance where Sowmya asked the contestant to sing Kambodhi Varnam. The contestant lacked clarity while singing the sahityam “Sarasauku ra ra”and Sowmya displayed here sarcasm and poor sense of humor and asked the contestant if Sarasa was her next door neighbor. Is this what you call constructive criticism? Not educative but belittling!

Why is it that they behave in such a demeaning fashion? It is often proved that the abused turns into abusers. Does this hold good for Carnatic Musicians too? So were these guys selected through such rounds of insults and abuse? Do they behave in such a way to increase the TRPs for the show? It looks more like a cheap reality show and not a career making platform. Are they threatened that they would lose their chance and popularity with new talents in the horizon?
When the show was first launched I felt this was like GRE, GMAT, US MLE exams that students take to go study overseas. It is highly competitive, but is it professionally healthy? Today so many youngsters come from all over the world to participate and if such is the treatment meted out to them, then Carnatic Music will soon be a forgotten art and Markazhi season will turn the summer of Carnatic Music thus defeating the very purpose of the show.

60 comments:

  1. Well said, I felt the same watching the first series last year! Yet to catch up with this year's, now after reading your feedback, I don't have any interest..
    I heard a similar behaviour of Sowmya in Supersinger, Nithyashree was so embarrased with her behaviour.. Atleast the director should have censored these non sense comments, Sashikaran is another crap, empty vessel

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think they want the 'drama' to increase ratings because I have seen such behaviour in all so-called talent shows and seriously, I would recommend parents not to put their kids through these nightmares in hopes for a career !

    ReplyDelete
  3. Carnatic music is life-long education and this program is supposed to be an educational experience. If taken so, then the behavior of these artistes is akin to ragging/bullying their juniors. Much like the experiences in educational institutions, perhaps these artistes themselves were bullied/embarrassed early on and are now simply passing on the "tradition" to the next generation. How disgusting!!

    What does carnatic music have to do with your clothes? is panthuvarali appealing only when you wear pattu veshti or pudavai?!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Whoa, I'm glad I didn't watch this on TV. Reading your account on it has left me disgusted enough! I must say, I'm not surprised for Carnatic Music, digging deep into the tunnel of commercialization has left fans of Sampradhaya Sangeetham disappointed, with a rare few showcasing its true identity. On top of this, incidents such has the one you've described will only add insult to injury.

    I hope this is published by a renowned print media player for these guys need a stark reality check!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Absolutely. I agree with all. I felt the same while the judges comments were mostly on the non-technical part of the participants. They will learn through experience how to shake , wave hands during aalapanai (you dont have to necessarily do it ), etc. Neyveli Sir handles the participants very well. The judges can be more matured people like Suguna amma and similar vidwans. Please take these judges out of the show showing immaturity.

    ReplyDelete
  6. If we closely look at the idol career development, there are some useful tec talk and some avoidable dig talk. It would have been an ideal idol show had they screened out the dig talk part for millions of viewers around globe. I just wonder how Thiyagaraja Swami would have transferred his skills to his disciples in those days without all these pomp and show and still we guys continue to sing his creations only. Decorum of Judges is of primary importance because contestants real life situation and bacground is not known namely family condition, guru treatment, location,travel and life condition and the oppotunity available to them. It is equally significant for the reason that non of the Judges who sit on the sofa never ever went through this kind of showy so called career idol and they would have learnt what they question now in a snail paced sessions with so many corrections and repeat guidance.
    Also, as is read from threads there is integrity loss in judgement beacuse 90% of the contestants selected have been students of judges and the left ones, though highly talented, have become scapegoat and victimized and sidelined as they are not blu eyed ones and no hidden support. This is seen from the way unbalanced questions put to different candidates.
    I wish atleat in the final Judges come out clean,unbiased and honest in giving the right opportunity to these youngsters to showcase their talent for a general consensus on the right idol selection. Otherwise future shows will prove to be counterproductive.

    ReplyDelete
  7. well encouragement by words is a key requirement in any assessment. It is fine after all there would be just one winner it is fine. Obviously by way of years of singing your levels are different. It is important that interactions must be done without thinking well i know a lot . The participants are to be made comfortable and not hassled. Many competent singers would question the need to participate in such a show. The improvements have to be communicated but certainly the judges have to think for themselves :) Even in a job interview the idea is to first make the candidate and never to be show off your knowledge. Then you interact and find the competence and give a feedback.:)

    ReplyDelete
  8. Kindly note typo errors and the para ia represented-

    For this-
    Even in a job interview the idea is to first make the candidate and never to be show off your knowledge. Then you interact and find the competence and give a feedback.:)

    Corrected to-
    Even in a job interview the idea is to first make the candidate comfortable and never to show off your knowledge. Then you interact and find the competence and give a feedback.:)

    ReplyDelete
  9. I am a regular follower of this program and i felt the same way all along. I live in US and i know how these same artists when visit for a concert tour, sing or play the same krithis again and again in every city and these people talk about creativity. What a shame? I think before selecting these people as judges some one has to select them with same rigorous process. Of all people Ganesh and Kumaresh as judges! Thank god i am not a contestant and i do not want to be a contestant before these judges.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Dear DR friends
    All said and done, now the final results were judged and announced.Intelleigently, the awards and recgnitions were allowed to be shared among the well performing contenstants. Mr.Ragavendra the winner of idol.It was konwn from the start as the comments of the judges were always positive towards him and he is aged 25 and son of a renowned mridangist who has influence with the arists as judges. He too performs well. If he misses this year then he will never be able to become Idol due to age band restriction.The best part of judgement is some contenstants who lagged behind moved ahead and got good recognition due to excellence in dday performance which cannot be mismanipulated by anyone as public stood as evidence.Thanks them for being fair in this regard.Another rigging as I heard was that the song list items given by candidates were interchanged and the efficiency in performance was pushed back and consequently the favorite itms of one went to another one and got recognition. To this extent the judgment is corrupted and twisted. These so called judges are not super administrators but only a recognised artists in their arena.
    The moot question of this career idol is which segment is superior Winner or runners up or on stage best performance or public preferred idol or what ? Who is going to be the rel winner is one who stays after this idol mela.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Perhaps Simon Cowell on the UK and American Idol shows has set the standard for behavior. I don't think Neyveli Santhanagopalan was much better than the others, although the fact that both his daughter Srirangini and his student Brinda were so impressive speaks well for his ability as a teacher. Unfortunately, he tended to hog all the questions. Sowmya and Ganesh were actually pretty good in the semi-final round except for a few lapses. More professionalism, more orderly judging (such as one question per judge), and a mix of more senior vidwans with younger musicians would probably improve the quality of judging. In spite of all this, as someone with no musical training, I found the technical insights the show provided fascinating and the high quality of the participants impressive.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Too many interjections and interruptions from everwhere when a contestant is responding to a question.
    Someone is asked to do bit of dance movements with hands / Someone else was asked to stay still - Is it all relevant in the discovery of the Idol?
    They have to feel at home and they will perform their best.

    ReplyDelete
  13. The accusation of favoritism seems unfair. The criterion appeared to be concert readiness rather than purely voice quality or the performance of a specific krithi. I haven't seen the 2011 finals, but Bharat Sundar, the 2010 winner, was clearly the most concert ready.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I felt the same thing about Sowmya. I think she is fit to act in any of the mega serials in a villi role.
    She is not mature enough. Also, I think may be the judges are scared that the new idol will be a competition to them.
    I really like the way Santhanagopalan sir is giving comments and encouraging the participants.
    Looks like Sasikiran is anyway a dummy as he gives a Yes to everyone and doesnt open his mouth for any questions.

    ReplyDelete
  15. It is an indirect insult to the great composers. However this insult will never affect their glory.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Well said. May be some serial director is likely to book Sowmya in the nearest future for a villi role. Probably she would volunteer to go in search of such jobs.

    ReplyDelete
  17. How easy it is to be critical, sorry take cheap shots, when you're anonymous. NRS man good. Sowmya woman bad. Great!

    ReplyDelete
  18. how strange!! all viewers who are just listeners are talking so ill about reputed musicians. But we will not like them commenting abt the performance abt youngsters who are the age of their students!! there is no learning unless you get your kuttu.. and my be all these judges are not modhirakaaigal...but definitely we neither have the modhira kai to kuutu the judges...decorum pl.calling a musician villi...empty vessel...very very hurting. I love the show for its transparency and the knowledge it imparts, mainly insisting the ingredients of a concert.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Mr Kuttu (anonymous),
    these are not kuttu (private) by the guru. These are insults "in public". If the so called judges just stop with stating the weaknesses no one would object it.

    This program is good ONLY in the sense that people learn the depth of carnatic music skills.
    In every other aspect this program is horrible.
    Yes I will continue to watch only due to 1. Santhana Gopalan's questions and comments and 2. see some kids so great at young age like last year's Master G. Abhilash (what happened to him btw?

    ReplyDelete
  20. You people clearly do not understand Carnatic Music, and the Carnatic Music Idol show. I understand that you might feel that these artistes humiliated these contestants, but the truth are they are terrible, and i have no idea how they even chose to participate. I am actually surprised, that the artistes, did not mention how bad they are, but gave them more confidence for future. With the artistes, saying the mistakes they are making, if u really want they can say "oh you are singing bad" they didn't do this which is very nice, since if they did you will be bringing the confidence of the students lower, but in this case, they helped the students confidence.

    You might think that i am a supporter nor a student of all of them. I am a student who is learning, and am just understanding music, and by this TV show, it is teaching me a lot.

    This is an educational tv show, and no bullying is taking place. First of all you all need to know the definition of bullying, and ask the contestants participating on the show, if they are being bullied before writing nonsense.

    ReplyDelete
  21. You all think how this boy was the winner of the carnatic music idol. Even though he was the son of a well known miruthangamist. Their was two others whose parents are in the carnatic field, but why weren't they chosen. This Show is not about whose parents are who, if you have talent you will make it to the finals, and this boy has done that. So there is no need to know the boys background for being selected as the winner.

    ReplyDelete
  22. If you do not wish the artists to state the weaknesses of the preformers, their is no point in this show, or even a winner. Obviously, even the artists, make mistakes and their is someone needed to point out the mistakes, so that they won't make it the next time, and become greater artistes. So i have no idea what is wrong with this. Everyone wishes, to have an opportunity, where performing artists, can just sit with them and listen to them sing, and correct their mistakes, so these contestants are extrmeley lucky and will definitely agree with me

    ReplyDelete
  23. @ Narashiman : If sashikiran as u said is crap ,empty vessel. Then u are crappier and emptier.

    @ SG : hahahaha

    @ Vijay : You never know the off stage rapport between the participants and the judges. Will your boss be okay if u wear a trouser and go to the office?? There is a dress code for everything. So shut up.

    @ Chandra : Watch it and then speak.

    @ Anonymous1 : Shaking hands and gestures thing was on a lighter note if u didn't understand that that is your mistake.

    @Anonymous2 : Poor stats !!

    @ Bluesky : If at all there was some inhibition from the participants end it was just due to their diffidence

    @ Anonymous3 : How much do you know in carnatic music to question the competence of the judges. I would like to learn from you. If u really are not competent then be ready to face a hard time

    @ Anonymous4 : Poor stats again. Raghavendra is not 25. He is just 23. Wait and watch who stands..

    @ Anonymous6 : Yes . I agree with one point. There were many interruptions in between.

    ReplyDelete
  24. @ anonymous who posted "I felt the same thing about Sowmya. I think she is fit to act in any of the mega serials in a villi role.
    She is not mature enough. Also, I think may be the judges are scared that the new idol will be a competition to them.
    I really like the way Santhanagopalan sir is giving comments and encouraging the participants.
    Looks like Sasikiran is anyway a dummy as he gives a Yes to everyone and doesnt open his mouth for any questions."


    Now you are the most immature.. :P

    ReplyDelete
  25. Sowmya and Shasikiran Project themselves as known people.... Frankly speaking when compared to Neyveli Sir, These people can be called ZERO... When veterans like Sri TNS/BMK still are performing, why arent they called as judges for such contests .... They at least have the maturity to handle the participants...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Shashi Karan does not hsve the vidwat to be judge,his singing with closed mouthis awful he is in the limelight only by manipulating publocity

      Delete
    2. Shashi Karan does not hsve the vidwat to be judge,his singing with closed mouthis awful he is in the limelight only by manipulating publocity

      Delete
  26. You might say they are better, since they have been in the music service longer than them. But not everyone can be both performers and teaching, only certain people can do this. SO STOP WITH THE NEGATIVE COMMENTS.. CAUSE YOU HAVE NO IDEA WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT

    ReplyDelete
  27. Some of these musicians, as I have seen with my less knowledge, is that they tend to show off their prowess in front of these youngsters. Someone said, Sowmya was not embrasive of the Thodi that Maharajapuram Santhanam's son sang, I can surely bet, she is no way close to singing when compared to what he sang, getting a doctrate in music does not mean you are a good musician yourself. If an accompanist sits next to Shashi Kiran in concerts, he or she has to watch hundred times to see if Shashi Kiran's left hand hits them in anyway, the clarity in music is displayed by actions, not music itself. Gayathri is quite mature in the sense, she is straight forward in her comments and gives some valuable suggestions also. As said, Neyveli Santhanagopalan is the only mature judge there. Last, I respect Ganesh and Kumaresh for their vast knowledge and their excellent concerts, hence donrt want to comment on their judge abilities.

    ReplyDelete
  28. In my last comment, mentioned Maharajapuram Santhanam's son, sorry was a typo, it is his grandson

    ReplyDelete
  29. There are many more senior musicians who are quite humble and blend well with the younger crowd, I have personally met Vijay Siva, down to earth, excellent, R K Sriram Kumar, very humble, Mysore brothers (Nagaraj and Manjunath), Bombay Jayashree,

    I would definitely say no to TMK, he has an ego too, in one of the concerts I remember his dirty comment to one of the audience, that brought down his whole image and respect he has

    Many are there who can be alternates to these folks

    ReplyDelete
  30. I totally agree with the last comment, even some miruthangam artsites like umayalpuram sivaraman sir, and even others, i definitely agree with mysore brothers, i have talked to them and they have so much knowledge about the art, and want it to continue to its max. There are also many other artistes, who do go abroad to teach, they should also be included, since they have a better idea, compared to sowmya and carnatica brothers, since they are just performing artists. I am not saying that they are bad, its just that their will be other artists, with a stronger idea of what to say to these young children, who are eager to learn

    ReplyDelete
  31. I live in the US and regularly watch through Youtube. Last year's winner Bharath was a good choice, although I feel Sriranjani also should have been chosen. I think the competition should be separate for men and women. I do not want to comment on the judges' qualities or contribution to music, although Sowmya, in my opinion, has contributed quite a bit. Nevertheless, I was not happy with her sarcastic attitude towards the contestants. Too much knowledge sometimes is bad as it brings about "garvam" or haughtiness and arrogance. Sad. As for Balaji, he is useless as a host; his comments make me cringe. There are others who could/should be judges, but until they sit in the judges seat, how would we know what their attitude would be? It would be nice if Jaya TV or Pothys had a public forum where these comments can be posted and read by the judges. The judges are human, so prone to inflated egos, but they have the capacity and opportunity to learn and change their behaviour. Finally, I am sad that some of the comments are written in poor taste. If we are critical, then how can we criticize the behavior of others?

    ReplyDelete
  32. yes. i agree with most of you in some judges being unreasonable in their judgement and not giving another chance to Krithika Natarajan and Subhiksha who was kicked out in quater finals. Re play all the youtube clips and listen to these girls, what a wonderful voice and surely they deserve another chance to next level. It is shame that Nandhini from Trivandrum was not voted YES by all, but God decided to bring her back, and she glittered in the finals. She is such a potential, scholarly and godly looking talented musician who can be equated to Dr. MLV. Listen to her "Raga Ratnam Yuva" program where she was a winner. She is grand daughter of senior disciple of Dr. Semmangudi Mamma. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7G-e68Dt8qc&feature=channel). Surprisingly, Dr. Sowmya was one of the judges where she was good, along with other good judges. Except Neyveli Anna, others needed training to become judges. Ganesh and Kumaresh is knowledgeable but needed little change in their approach. That Balaji should stop his bla, bla stuff and stop making some silly comments on those youngsters and not letting them to say what they wanted to, after being asked to say few words. Otherwise, I will replace you pretty soon as I am from a music family, a great music lover and needed a job once I return from USA.

    ReplyDelete
  33. While its easy to be critical about the judges, I would like to speak about the unfair treatment meted to the contestants chosen for the finals. I witnessed the finals as a music lover, being part of the audience. But was in for a rude shock listening to the choices for the super 6 - Raghavendra (ofcourse) though deserved to be selected, but definitely not with a margin of 20 marks ahead of the second contestant. Nandini is certainly capable but her voice did not help her at all and so she did not deserve to be in the finals. Aishwarya & Anahita were ok. But the crappiest judgement was the selection of Ganesh Kartik and Vishnu Namboothiri. Vishnu actually slipped while singing the swara and Ganesh Kartik was below average. Instead the choices should have been Maharajapuram ganesh Viswanathan - his majectic voice and rendition of Hindolam is still ringing in my ears. The applause was deafening after his rendition of virutham. Subashree's singing prowess also deserved a selection in the super 6. Looks like politics played a huge role in this selection. Nothing against Raghavendra, but somehow there were others more qualified - but not everybody had the equation his musician father enjoyed with the artiste judges...

    ReplyDelete
  34. Very well said. Though I mus say that Sashikiran was more kinder to the contestants and humble.

    Gayathri was also fairly humble.

    I hope the idol competition does not kill creativity of the other contestants.

    ReplyDelete
  35. It appears that the most important asset/quality was mastery over laya - both Bharat Sundar (who knows konnakkol) and Raghavendra (Srimushnam Raja Rao's son) obviously have good laya. This is essential for success as a Carnatic stage musician, which appeared to be the criterion for Carnatic Music Idol.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Anonymous at 4:06 AM called the contestants "young children." Sorry, but they are young adults. Many if not most of them have already given given public concerts. The attitude of the judges, although not perfect, was that of a professor toward a PhD student, encouraging at times, critical at others, occasionally disparaging when the student should know better. Yes, criticism in a public forum seems demeaning, but faltering on a concert stage could be worse. The good ones will get over the barbs and fashion themselves into better artists.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Let us end this useless debate. Let's all enjoy carnatic music forgetting these minor issues.

    ReplyDelete
  38. First of about the dress regulation
    A boy from Sholingar was completely foxed by the absurd comment by the programe jockey Mr. Balaji who unnessarily discouraged the boy for coming in pants and shirts And Sowmya and Ganesh finished it by again telling about the dress regulation I myself had seen one Violinist appearing in pants and shirt at Music Academy. See the silly thing A girl aged about 12 years comes to the concert stage clad in a Jari peeticoat with a blouse minus half saree But it was allowed But this boy completely covered himself with a pand shirt was given a dressing up. This young boy lost all hie courage because of this

    Jagannathan New York

    ReplyDelete
  39. the competition did not set a level playing field for all It looked as though some four competitors were to take running race One was given 100 metre dash another 200 meter race third 100 m hurdles. and sso on. What they could have dont is to set an uniform standard of tesing for isntance some aalapanaa then kalpana swaram a small piece of Thanam one small piece of Thillaana

    ReplyDelete
  40. For those who believe that Raghavendra received favoritism because of his musical lineage, let's not forget that Maharajapuram Ganesh has an equal or greater musical lineage and was not selected for the finals.

    ReplyDelete
  41. Well Raghavendra's father certainly enjoys a good equation with the judges, which helped him clinch the title. Nobody can dispute this fact. Maharajapuram Ganesh has a great voice, a great musical lineage - but was not the favourite of the judges. Well he knows konakkol too but sadly was not even given an opportunity to display his prowess. Raghavendra is certainly deserving, but the question is shouldn't all deserving candidates be given an equal platform to display their talents? Carnatic music idol did not provide an equal platform for all participants - if it really did then I wonder how somebody like Vishnu Namboothiri could have been chosen for the super six.

    ReplyDelete
  42. read all the comments and as far as the criticism same kind of opinion is given by most of the viewers. Coming to the point of criticizing the knowledge of sowmya it was unfair;she is definitely knowledgeable.As far as the questions asked to the participants is technically not applied in a concert very regularly and even if it is done people are not ready to appreciate too much of kanaku in the swaraprastharam.infact the general opinion from the viewers is that these judges bored with too many technical questions.They could have showed only the singing part of the participants.I accept the balaji was very very bad host with his untimely and unethical jokes.Though the judges were very harsh in their comments the participants should be aware of the pronunciation and the splitting of words with meaning which is very important.I recently attended vedavalli mami's workshop where she spoke about the phrases to be used for nireval knowing the meaning. all these mistakes were perfectly prompted by the judges. this aspect was definitely lacking among the participants.Infact according to me none of them deserved the position of carnatic idol as it needs lot of practice and dedication to become a performer.But definitely it is a learning experience for the participants and the viewers it is a learning experience not to be a bad listener.For the participants they dont need this kind of a reality show as most of the sabhas giving opportunity based on their respective sabhas music competitions and also govt run competitons.sowmya is worthy being a judge bcos she has learnt so much from her guru Dr.S.Ramanathan and she has come up in her career only by her talent and merit. THE DRESSCODE DEFINITELY MATTERS. there is so much emphasis on dresscode in other fields and places. then why not on stage ?

    ReplyDelete
  43. Can someone let me know when the CMI finals happenned. I watched a couple of semifinal episodes and then the show was taken off air. Or did I miss it, I am not sure.

    ReplyDelete
  44. Most of them already preform on their own and why are they coming for to become " a carnatic idol" when too be honest, many of them who knows how they even give performaces of their own. Well their was nothing wrong with what the judges were telling them, who else will tell them from what is right and wrong. As a contestant i am greatful for this opportunity and totally satisfied with what they told, and where i need to improve. I recommend this to continue each year, and students to go, just for the learning benefit.

    ReplyDelete
  45. Yes, I cannot agree with you more. I heard that the judges are equally mean even at Cleveland Aradhana. Why all these classical musicians have to be mean to convey their message? They need to be trained to become judges with humility and humbleness. They need to understand that they are not only judges in these competitions but also role models.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Except for neyveli santhanagopalan..None of the judges showed maturity. Though i am a big fan of ganesh Kumaresh, they spanked of arrogance.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pSuRanwS-Dw&feature=related

    Clearly in the video it was santhanagopalan who asked the intelligent ques which not only tested the participant but also helped him learn a lot.

    ReplyDelete
  47. I recently saw soumya dancing for a song and it was like an elephant with a problem of constipation. But, I still did not mind, only because she is not a dancer. She should be a bit more magnanimous, when she is judging the budding singers, when they are still not great musicians.

    ReplyDelete
  48. The presenter/host/compere is a douc**bag. As for the judges themselves, I have immense respect for them as artistes, so dont want to comment. I see your point though - How criticism should be relevant, constructive and not-demoralizing, especially given the tender and impressionable age of participants.

    ReplyDelete
  49. Some of the finalists are disciples of Neyveli Santhanagopalan .... How does that work? Just wondering.

    ReplyDelete
  50. I am really pained to see these competitions taking place in USA. Jaya TV is a Tamil Channel and while seeing this program, we sometimes forget if we are watching a Tamil Programme at all or not. None of the children have bothered to speak in Tamil even though most (If not all) of the people have their mother tongue as Tamil. Even the parents dont seem to talk in Tamil. They have taken so much pains to teach them Carnatic music. But not their own mother tongue. I am really pained when Neyveli sir asks a question in Tamil, the participant cannot answer in Tamil. The girl/ Boy speaks in American accented English, but he wants to learn Carnatic music. What an irony!!! First let these snobbish NRI's learn to speak in their mother tongue and teach their children their mother tongue. Then they can teach them Carnatic or whatever. If this goes on as usual, I remember the phrase " Thamizh Ini Mellachahum"

    ReplyDelete
  51. Why are some of you people jeleousy abt the performance of children of great musicians and abt NRI s children speaking American accent English and also learning Carntic music and singing for a global competition like this Carnatic Music Idol Ifeel and suggest you also prepare your children and give a chance to shine with their talents in the area of their interest.Dont envy others. Mrs. Sowmya is definitely not only a very good singer but also a strict and diciplined teacher who has trained many yougsters with the noble art of carnatic music and has brought many young artists to this world. which should be definitely appreciated and supported by all of us. there no second thought abt it I can definitely say.

    ReplyDelete
  52. If the judges read this, and I hope someone will tell them to, I have this to say to them. Just video yourself and see your facial and verbal expressions in context. And then you will realize that some of your facial expression show to the world what kind of person you are.
    One of the male judge is oozing with a contemptuous smile, trying to ridicule the performer with his body/face language. The kids take it coolly, poor things. But you the judge is uncovering the shit you have inside of you. I am sorry to use a strong language, but that is what it is.
    Go and read TA if you want to understand, read Script analysis, to understand your own dirty/bad script, and then try to become a better person, more than being an artist.
    K.Seshadri

    ReplyDelete
  53. Carnatic Music is much more than these TV shows and the panel of judges who give sarcastic (and in case of few people like Neyveli sir) constructive comments.And I was shocked to see Sowmya mam in Airtel super singer show as a judge - fashionable and much unlike a 'sangeetha vidhwan'. And she actually praises the contestants on that show ( most of the times the contestants sing off sruthi). And the musical skills of these judges are not getting better.I would love to say it has declined but I am just a student who learns carnatic music.But I think people are doing such absurd things to increase TRP ratings because the kind of encouragement youngsters get in places like Music Academy and Narada Gana Sabha is really amazing.But alas! politics occur there too!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  54. I think Carnatic Music Idol is gone and the new(3rd?) episode for 2013 is happening in USA!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  55. Carnatic Idol in the US is also rife with politics, There is an organization called CAMAGA in my city. Supposedly this organization's mission is to encourage and preserve classical music. But it is run by a group of individuals who are as haughty and rude as the "great" Dr.Sowmya. CAMAGA has been collaborating with JAYA TV to bring the competition to the US. There is nepotism and under hand dealings all the way. It is so sad to see young music enthusiasts getting demotovated and discouraged just by the unprofessional way with which the program is conducted.

    ReplyDelete
  56. The Carnatic Idol USA is taking palce every year in USA. The same judges Soumya and troop come year also. They act as if thet are demi gods.
    I am an audience to all such competitions. The level of teati g as compared to the Indian counterparts is many folds lesser.
    If one wins a The Grand FIrst prize in USA, they are NOT equal to even the 100 placement in Indaii, not to ask about the pride and coverage the so called money minting gurus of USA

    ReplyDelete
  57. Are all of you out of your minds??? Stop critisising legends like Srimathi Sowmya, Ganeshji and Kumareshji. Just because you know nothing about Shastriya Sangeetham doesn't mean that you can type whatever that comes to your minds. Fools. By critisising these maestros, you are inviting bad luck and pavam to yourself. Stop giving bad comments about this. Please stop posting false and irrelevant posts like these. You should be ashamed of your atrocious behaviour. Stop this at once! I hope never to see or hear about people like this. Thank you

    ReplyDelete